Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
internal:stsm-guide [2010/04/16 11:00] andrey.rybalchenko |
internal:stsm-guide [2011/05/20 15:31] (current) enric.rodriguez.carbonell |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ============================== | ============================== | ||
| - | DURATION: minimum one week (5 working days), maximum 3 months. | + | OBJECTIVE: Establish or enforce collaboration, especially when |
| - | Exception for Early Stage Researchers (less than PhD + 10 years): | + | the expected outcome is a joint publication between Action members. |
| - | up to 6 months prior MC approval | + | |
| + | DURATION: minimum one week (5 working days), maximum 3 months. | ||
| + | Exception for Early Stage Researchers (less than PhD + 8 years): | ||
| + | up to 6 months, with prior MC approval | ||
| FINANCIAL SUPPORT: The grant only covers travel and subsistence. | FINANCIAL SUPPORT: The grant only covers travel and subsistence. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
| EUR 300 for travel | EUR 300 for travel | ||
| - | The total should not exceed EUR 2500 (EUR 3500 for Early Stage Researchers). | + | The total should not exceed EUR 2500 up to 3 months (or EUR 3500 for Early Stage Researchers – above 3 months). |
| Any exception needs prior approval from the COST Office. | Any exception needs prior approval from the COST Office. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
| PROCEDURE BEFORE STSM: | PROCEDURE BEFORE STSM: | ||
| - | (0) WHO : Applicant | + | (1) WHO: Applicant (IC0901-specific) |
| + | |||
| + | WHAT: Sending pre-approval request email to our 3 STSM committee members and richmodels-hq: | ||
| + | |||
| + | o Andrey Rybalchenko <rybal@in.tum.de> | ||
| + | o Stefan Ratschan <stefan.ratschan@cs.cas.cz> | ||
| + | o Enric Rodriguez Carbonell <erodri@lsi.upc.edu> | ||
| + | o in CC put <richmodels-hq@epfl.ch> | ||
| + | |||
| + | indicating: | ||
| + | |||
| + | o the Action groups involved | ||
| + | o the exact dates | ||
| + | o a short description of the proposed workplan (about 250 words). | ||
| + | Make sure to include as specific as possible a description of the expected outcomes of STSM. | ||
| + | o a budget request with breakdown for the costs of the STSM (travel + hotel/meals) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The applicant may attach to this email any document which is regarded as helpful in | ||
| + | supporting the application at the evaluation process (such as CV, | ||
| + | list of publications, motivation letter, letter of support from | ||
| + | the home institute etc.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If case of positive pre-approval, this e-mail is to be reused below. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | (2) WHO : STSM coordinator (IC0901-specific) | ||
| + | |||
| + | WHAT: After discussion of the STSM committee, reporting the assessment of the STSM proposal to the applicant | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | (3) WHO : Applicant | ||
| WHAT: Using the on-line registration tool | WHAT: Using the on-line registration tool | ||
| Line 46: | Line 78: | ||
| The on-line registration tool will issue a formal STSM application | The on-line registration tool will issue a formal STSM application | ||
| which has to be downloaded and sent by the applicant | which has to be downloaded and sent by the applicant | ||
| - | electronically (by e-mail as attachment) together with any | + | electronically (by e-mail as attachment) to: |
| - | necessary document which the applicant may regard as helpful in | + | |
| - | supporting the application at the evaluation process (such as CV, | + | |
| - | list of publications, motivation letter, letter of support from | + | |
| - | the home institute etc.) to: | + | |
| o the future Host institution of the STSM; and | o the future Host institution of the STSM; and | ||
| Line 57: | Line 85: | ||
| // and CC: richmodels-hq@epfl.ch | // and CC: richmodels-hq@epfl.ch | ||
| - | (1) WHO : STSM coordinator | ||
| - | WHAT: Arranging the assessment of the STSM proposal according to | + | (4) WHO : STSM coordinator |
| + | |||
| + | WHAT: Arranging the final assessment of the STSM proposal according to | ||
| our rules in http://richmodels.epfl.ch/internal:stsm | our rules in http://richmodels.epfl.ch/internal:stsm | ||
| | | ||
| - | (2) WHO : STSM committee | + | (5) WHO : STSM committee |
| WHAT: Reporting on the decisions and assessments regarding all | WHAT: Reporting on the decisions and assessments regarding all | ||
| Line 70: | Line 99: | ||
| - | (3) WHO : STSM committee | + | (6) WHO : STSM committee |
| WHAT: Announcing approved STSMs on the MC mailing list and | WHAT: Announcing approved STSMs on the MC mailing list and | ||
| Line 76: | Line 105: | ||
| | | ||
| - | (4) WHO : STSM coordinator | + | (7) WHO : STSM coordinator |
| - | WHAT: If the assessment is positive, informing the Grant Holder | + | WHAT: Informing the Grant Holder about the decision. |
| - | that the proposed STSM has been approved. This information can be | + | If the assessment is positive, this information can be |
| in the form of an e-mail stating: | in the form of an e-mail stating: | ||
| "Subject: STSM <Reference number>, COST <Action number>, <grantee's name> | "Subject: STSM <Reference number>, COST <Action number>, <grantee's name> | ||
| Line 90: | Line 119: | ||
| o the host institute accepted the proposal." | o the host institute accepted the proposal." | ||
| - | (5) WHO : Grant Holder | ||
| - | WHAT: In case of a positive assessment and availability of | + | (8) WHO : Grant Holder |
| - | funding, sending to the applicant the following: | + | |
| - | A) a Grant letter in which he/she is informed about: | + | WHAT: In case of a positive assessment and availability of |
| + | funding, sending to the applicant | ||
| + | a Grant letter in which he/she is informed about: | ||
| o the approval of the STSM and; | o the approval of the STSM and; | ||
| o the level of the financial grant given. | o the level of the financial grant given. | ||
| - | B) a Payment Request Form. This form should be more or less the | ||
| - | same as for the Pay-As-You-Go system (Vademecum Part A, page 20), | ||
| - | but issued by the Grant Holder instead of the COST office. | ||
| - | (6) WHO: Applicant | + | (9) WHO: Applicant |
| WHAT: Returning the Grant letter to the Grant Holder, after | WHAT: Returning the Grant letter to the Grant Holder, after | ||
| Line 112: | Line 138: | ||
| PROCEDURE AFTER STSM: | PROCEDURE AFTER STSM: | ||
| - | (7) WHO : Applicant | + | (10) WHO : Applicant |
| - | WHAT: Submitting to the host institution and MC Chair (or the STSM | + | WHAT: Submitting to the host institution and MC Chair (or the STSM |
| - | coordinator) a short scientific report on the visit within 4 weeks after | + | coordinator) a short scientific report on the visit within 4 weeks after |
| - | his/her stay. It should contain the following information: | + | his/her stay. It should contain the following information: |
| - | o Purpose of the STSM; | + | o Purpose of the STSM; |
| - | o Description of the work carried out during the STSM; | + | o Description of the work carried out during the STSM; |
| - | o Description of the main results obtained; | + | o Description of the main results obtained; |
| - | o Future collaboration with host institution (if applicable); | + | o Future collaboration with host institution (if applicable); |
| - | o Foreseen publications/articles resulting or to result from the STSM (if applicable); | + | o Foreseen publications/articles resulting or to result from the STSM (if applicable); |
| - | o Confirmation by the host institution of the successful execution of | + | o Confirmation by the host institution of the successful execution of |
| - | the STSM; | + | the STSM; |
| - | o Other comments (if any). | + | o Other comments (if any). |
| - | (8) WHO : Applicant | ||
| - | WHAT: Sending to the Grant Holder the completed Payment Request | + | (11) WHO : STSM coordinator |
| - | Form and a summary of the scientific report (maximum 1 page). | + | |
| + | WHAT: The MC Chair or the STSM coordinator is responsible for: | ||
| + | o Approving the scientific report | ||
| + | o Informing the Grant Holder that the STSM has been successfully accomplished and that the | ||
| + | grant can be paid. | ||
| + | | ||
| + | The e-mail should include the scientific report and state: | ||
| + | "Subject: STSM <Reference number<, COST <Action number>, <grantee's name> | ||
| - | (9) WHO : STSM coordinator | + | On behalf of the Management Committee of the above COST Action I would like to inform |
| - | + | you that: | |
| - | WHAT: Sending a "Notice of completion" to the Grant Holder with | + | o The above STSM has been completed from <Start date> to <End date> |
| - | the confirmation that the STSM has been successfully accomplished | + | o The scientific report has been approved by the MC and Host. |
| - | and that the grant can be paid. The information is usually in the | + | o The amount of EUR X can be paid" |
| - | form of an e-mail stating: | + | |
| - | "Subject: STSM <Reference number<, COST <Action number>, <grantee's name> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | On behalf of the Management Committee of the above COST Action I would like to inform | + | |
| - | you that: | + | |
| - | o The above STSM has been completed from <Start date> to <End date> | + | |
| - | o The scientific report has been approved by the MC and Host. | + | |
| - | o The amount of EUR X can be paid" | + | |
| - | (10)WHO : Grant Holder | ||
| - | WHAT: Executing the payment of the grant directly to the grantee | + | (12) WHO : Grant Holder |
| - | or the host institution as requested in the application after | + | |
| - | receipt of the following documents: | + | |
| - | o Notice of completion by the Management Committee; | + | WHAT: Executing the payment of the grant directly to the grantee |
| - | o Completed Payment Request Form; | + | or the host institution as requested in the application after |
| - | o Summary of scientific report (maximum 1 page). | + | reception of the approval mail and the scientific report |
| DEADLINES: The application together with the MC approval should be | DEADLINES: The application together with the MC approval should be | ||
| sent by the MC Chair or STSM coordinator to the Grant Holder at least | sent by the MC Chair or STSM coordinator to the Grant Holder at least | ||
| - | X weeks before the STSM starts (X to be set by the Grant Holder) | + | 4 weeks before the STSM starts |
| </code> | </code> | ||